10:00 AM: Stop all over again
I don't free-associate much in my day-to-day goings on, or my writing. Between myself and my brother Eric I am by far the one more concerned with cause and effect, rhyme and reason. That's not to say I can't dig the unconventional or appreciate it when it's done well, but as far as things I create, I'm always aware of progression and development. I think awareness allows me to manipulate more.
I think it comes down to our differing notions of what constitutes art. He is very into David Lynch and Kafka and things, the obscure things, the ambiguous and open-to-interpretation. I like them too to a degree, and he likes the conventional to a degree, but I think he privileges the obscure, ambiguous things over the direct. True art is incomprehensible.
I see no reason why art can't be something that simply is what it is. If not, how could the Mona Lisa or the Statue of David be? They would simply be things, not works of art. Art, to me, (at least for now) is any work in which every piece can be said to work together, to perform its duty, whatever that duty may be. The original Star Wars trilogy is a work of art, and the Conversation is a work of art. but people paid money to see the former a lot more.
What I'm getting at has to do with my entry titles, which are not usually references to anything, and are the only real free-form stuff I do, some nearly being short poems in themselves. I think Eric would appreciate them, but for very good reasons I have kept Eric separate from SWP, and he has kept himself separate from it too.
I've been battling with other peoples' poetry recently. I hate other peoples' poetry, and it is from this hatred that I make my own, which everyone else is free to hate. Professional poets usually manage to avoid or even subvert the tendency of amateurs to rely on the overly vague. It was Guthrie who told me - and Reibetanz who praised me for pointing out - the virtue of the concrete. Guth went so far as to say it was probably inadvisable to write the word "love" in your poem because of how abstract that is. Symbolism is one thing, but if you can't figure out what you're talking about, nobody else will either. Consider Robert Frost. Go consider him.
Nearly all the poetry I have written is, to some extent, my attempt to recapture for other people the feeling I got when I read Mexican Loneliness, an obscure poem by Kerouac (always more celebrated for his prose than verse, and with good reason.) It was reading that one poem that really opened my mind about poetry. It says so much just be being direct and simple. I have read and enjoyed many poems since then - occasionally written by people who are not professionals - but that was really the first one I got, really got. It was a little like my first viewing of Night On Earth: it made me realize what I wanted to say, or rather how to go about saying it. You invoke a time and a place, and then let the language you use to describe it invoke the feelings, rather than try to force someone to feel some way.
Funny for a guy who spends much of his time writing elaborate penis jokes to be talking so much of art. I don't want to be pretentious, I don't want to aspire to great things, I want to be great at things that are in my sphere, things like penis jokes and relationship humour. I think Half-Past might actually be close to art, especially when you consider it was written to deliberately exploit peoples' expectations when they go to the theatre. All the pieces working together.
I think the most influential image I ever saw was of a woman's crotch, when I was in grade 7 or maybe early in grade 8. It was about that time when you have known for a while the score: romantic comedies make sense (but still seem stupid) the boy-girl dynamic is getting into the shape it will be of the rest of your life. You know the game, but you're not yet aware of the stakes. It was a panty shot, not a nudie pic, although I think the panties were at least a little see-through. I'd probably seen naked pictures or models or whatever somewhere or other, (what young boy, in a misguided search for racy material, does not thumb through the lingerie section of the Sears catalogue?) but this was the first one that stuck with me, that felt like it meant something, even though it was just a meaningless still designed to titillate perverts (a pervert in my view is someone who is aroused by something that ought not to be arousing... so this doesn't really count.) I had obsessed over girls before seeing this photo, but I think it really crystallized a feeling I'd chase for years, even to this day, and that has motivated my writing, and the way I've lived my life, this entire time, and for the foreseeable future.
I am inching closer to finishing this draft. And then I will go back and smooth out the uneven ends in the tone. I've got to learn not to write before bed, it jsut gets me keyed up.
I watched Funny People last night, talking of the art of the penis joke. It was more or less as I'd expected it, which is probably more than most people can say, people who were expecting a funny movie rather than a rather introspective deconstruction of people who are funny. Not surprising it wasn't much of a financial success and I have to wonder whether this will color the public perception of Apatow going forward. Probably not -- people don't think about perception. It was actually a little hard to deal with, especially how alienating the Adam Sandler character was, even moreso than his Punch-Drunk Love character because this guy was closer to reality, making his flaws that much more unnerving. More than wondering about how people will see Apatow, I wonder where Apatow goes after this, how he goes back to lightweight comedic fare (or even heavyweight comedic fare like 40-Year-Old Virgin and Knocked Up) when he has so thoroughly disassembled that world.
Maybe by doing something with Bill Murray. That'd be cool.
Something weird happened on Saturday. Dad picked me up after work, it was his weekend. His kitchen is being repainted, so the four of us (with B. and Deb) went out to Swiss Chalet. As usual when this idea was proposed, my first thought was "Oh no, dinner in a public place." then I thought "Fuck it, it's Swiss Chalet. It's literally the exact same as every other meal I have had from there over the years." Like 90% of the people who go there, I got the quarter white with fries. Partway through the meal, suddenly, B. got violently ill as badly or worse than I normally do, and hid out in the washroom until we were ready to go. Since I was feeling perfectly fine, I wondered whether I had passed it on. But that's silly... isn't it?
Today, a patently uninteresting day during which I slacked, and we worked for two hours after closing to do nothing of particular importance. I mainly amused myself by chatting up Alex, although nothing important was said. Small crew, a few had no-showed. Me, Spencer and Alex as the temps, Gus and Alan as the management. No Taylors or Chantelles. I haven't seen Kas in weeks. One temp has flown the coop, Brad, who seemed a decent bloke, Jaime still out sick I reckon. Before work I hung out with Manda, the usual, or at least its abbreviated form. Still no haircut.
That's the long and short of it. I've been steadily posting old poems and stuff to Writer's Cafe. Check it out if you're not afraid to brave the dark recesses of my psyche.
Everything I do is an attempt at a balancing act. I never want to be too much of anything.
Keep on rockin'
-Scotto
